@elliotpagesneakers
Instagram · Prop Yap
@elliotpagesneakers Bruhhh, maybe my mind is just being altered🤷♂️
@elliotpagesneakers
Instagram · Prop Yap
@elliotpagesneakers Bruhhh, maybe my mind is just being altered🤷♂️
Performance
Video #46726 · Prop Yap
[01]
The creator introduces a high-tech Nike shoe and its 'mind-altering' properties, then sets up a blindfold test with a friend to see if they can distinguish the real shoe from a fake one by feel. After a series of comedic guesses and misdirections, the creator reveals a final twist: both pairs of shoes used in the test were fakes.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook
How is this possible??
Verbal hook
Nike spent ten years in a science lab making this pair of shoes.
Visual hook
The creator holds up a visually distinct white Nike shoe with an orange, textured sole, followed by rapid cuts to slick, futuristic promotional footage from Nike.
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
Juxtapose a product's high-concept, almost mythical origin story with a cheap, accessible alternative, posing a question about the true value of the original.
Payoff
The final beat reveals a second, larger deception that completely subverts the initial premise of the video, providing a humorous or shocking conclusion that proves the unverifiable claim was likely false all along.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Double-Blind Deception
To test an extraordinary or unverifiable product claim through a seemingly scientific experiment, which is then systematically undermined by the creator through a series of tricks and misdirections, culminating in a final twist that subverts the entire premise.
The Unverifiable Thesis
State the product's unique, non-physical, or subjective benefit that is difficult to prove or disprove, establishing the central question of the video.
The Experimental Protocol
Announce a structured, seemingly objective test (e.g., blind test) to validate the thesis, establishing the rules of the game for the viewer and building anticipation.
Gauntlet 1: The Control Test
Run the experiment with a first subject. Deliver the results with a small misdirection or head-fake to create a moment of surprise before confirming an expected outcome.
Gauntlet 2: The Setup for Deception
Run the experiment with a second subject, but secretly alter the conditions of the test to make a clear result impossible, creating confusion and intrigue.
The First Twist Reveal
Reveal the initial deception to the subject and the audience, resetting the experiment and raising the stakes for a final, 'fair' attempt.
Gauntlet 3: The Final Test
Re-run the experiment under the pretense of being fair and final, leading the audience to expect a definitive conclusion.
Bruhhh, maybe my mind is just being altered🤷♂️
title · beginning
How is this possible??
informational · middle
Nike Mind 001 A MIND-ALTERING SHOE
contextual · beginning
SPENT
contextual · beginning
YEARS
contextual · beginning
SCIENCE
contextual · middle
FAKE
contextual · middle
REAL?
contextual · end
INCORRECT
Nike spent ten years in a science lab making this pair of shoes. So what happens when China fakes them and sells them for $30? Because according to Nike, this shoe is supposed to be mind altering to help athletes lock in pre game. So of course, the fake pair is not going to have the mind altering effect or will it? So we're both gonna be doing a blindfold test. See if you can feel the little mind controlledness. You cannot see, right? No. Which one is the fake? Which one's the real? I'm getting more like feeling of the little nodes in my right foot. I'm saying these are the real ones. Which ones? Wrong. Really? No. You're right. Yeah. Yeah. I'm right. Yeah. Blind. There's one. There's the other. Oh. What we saying? They feel this. Well, they're both the same shield. Okay. Tell the difference? No. What tier you doing? What the hell? Little bit more in the right. Which is the real, which is the fake? Right is the real. Incorrect. Those are the fakes. What?