@mikeinprogress_
Instagram · Carousel
@mikeinprogress_ I’m open to debate, just not over things that aren’t true. #factsmatter #feminism #debate
Trending short videosScreenshots of a debate about feminism.
The edit1 shot · 13 text
Shots Text
Performance
- Views
- 106K
- Likes
- 7.1K
- Comments
- 607
- Engagement
- 7.2%
- Outlier
- 4.5×
Video #16244 · Carousel
Screenshots of a debate about feminism.from @mikeinprogress_
[01]
Overview
This is a five-slide carousel post that documents a social media debate between two individuals over the definition of feminism. The content is presented as a series of screenshots, allowing the audience to follow the argument and counter-arguments sequentially.
[02]
Simple outline
- 1Hook with a polarizing stance
- 2Introduce the detractor's challenge
- 3Escalate through ideological clash
- 4Dismantle the detractor's premise
- 5Close by exposing hidden motives
[03]
Related videos
570.9K66×Political statements on floral backgrounds.@kulacloth · Statement Carousel
44.5KDebunking common brand marketing stereotypes for 2025@house.of.ag · Hot Take
356.4K66.7×Instagram viral trend report carousel@iammichellegifford · Guide Carousel
671.1K88.3×Therapist's opinions on mental health@isabelgeorginataylor · Statement Carousel
1.1M4.8×Relatable relationship meme carousel post@peytonknight · Statement Carousel
1.2M2.5×Relatable life problem meme carousel@peytonknight · Statement Carousel
304.6KMotivational carousel reframing entrepreneurship struggles vs a 9-5@angelagiakas · Statement Carousel
381.3K32.5×Relatable meme carousel about life choices@britandco
915.6K7.8×Relatable dating and lifestyle memes@peytonknight · Statement Carousel
180.4KEducational photo carousel with money advice.@workinghardpod · Guide Carousel
726.6K73.7×Spooky Halloween social commentary memes@commonsearth · Screenshot Carousel
55.1KInformational carousel comparing marketing roles.@ksmmarketing.co · Guide Carousel[04]
Classification
Format
Concepts
Elements
Account
[05]
Hook analysis
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook · 60%
As a man who cares about feminism, this is a hill I will die on:
Verbal hook · 30%
I’m open to debate, just not over things that aren’t true.
Visual hook · 10%
The format of a social media conversation presented as a series of screenshots creates immediate curiosity, inviting the viewer to read the exchange and follow the argument.
[06]
Hook template
Steal this for your own video
As a who cares about , this is a hill I will die on: .
- — As a personal trainer who cares about body confidence, this is a hill I will die on: You do not need to earn your food.
- — As a teacher who cares about student well-being, this is a hill I will die on: Rest is not a reward for burnout.
- — As a financial advisor who cares about accessible money advice, this is a hill I will die on: A budget should give you freedom, not shame.
[07]
Hook and payoff
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
Establish the protagonist's bold baseline stance and immediately introduce the antagonist's initial challenge to create instant narrative tension.
Payoff
The antagonist loses composure. The protagonist delivers a final, multi-point monologue that exposes the antagonist's hidden motives, refuses further validation, and definitively shuts down the debate.
[08]
Narrative framework
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Public Takedown Sequence
Leveraging a documented, multi-slide public argument to demonstrate authority, systematically dismantling a detractor's logic, and culminating in a satisfying psychological mic-drop.
- 1
The Ideological Clash
The antagonist presents their counter-framework or 'proof', which the protagonist meets with an unwavering, flat denial to escalate the conflict.
- 2
The Meta-Argument
The antagonist demands justification and becomes condescending. The protagonist refuses to engage on the antagonist's terms, framing their own position as unassailable fact rather than an opinion up for debate.
- 3
The Premise Rejection
The antagonist points to their ignored evidence. The protagonist systematically dismantles the validity of that evidence, labeling it as a fabricated construct rather than objective truth.
Themes
Techniques
Trends
Post caption
I’m open to debate, just not over things that aren’t true. #factsmatter #feminism #debate
Text overlays
informational · photo_0
Mike Underell @ 1d As a man who cares about feminism, this is a hill I will die on: Scott Galloway is a wolf in sheep's clothing and men should not be taking advice from him when it comes to women and relationships.
informational · photo_0
Seven, the Archivist 16h What is the opposite of "feminism"?
informational · photo_0
Mike Underell @ 16h Inequality, imho.
informational · photo_0
Seven, the Archivist 16h Wouldn't it — really obviously — be "masculism"?
informational · photo_1
Mike Underell @ 15h No, because feminism's core ideal is that everyone - including men - are treated equally.
informational · photo_1
Seven, the Archivist 15h Feminism's core ideal cannot be equality, because feminism is one of the two possible poles away from equality. [Diagram showing a spectrum from Feminism to Equality to Masculism]
informational · photo_1
Mike Underell @ 15h You're wrong about that.
informational · photo_2
Seven, the Archivist 15h Why? Because you say I am? That's an assertion, not an explanation. Anyone can assert anything: • The Moon is made of green cheese. • Santa Claus is a real person. • You're more intelligent than I am. See? Just empty statements. Just making them doesn't prove they're true.
informational · photo_2
Mike Underell @ 14h Not because I say so, but because your definition of feminism is wrong. As you said, anyone can assert anything. You asserted something that is wrong, so I said you were wrong. There is no further explanation needed. Your assertion does not equal a fact nor does it negate a fact.
informational · photo_3
Seven, the Archivist 14h Edited But I did explain my assertion, and you have conspicuously ignored that. I explain it with a few more words here, though the diagram I made is really all a working brain needs to understand this absurdly self-evident concept: substack.com/seventhearchivist/note/c-1...
informational · photo_3
Mike Underell @ 13h Explaining your assertion does not make it true nor does it put it on equal footing as fact. You don't get to redefine feminism simply because you want to or because you have made a graphic. You're conflating opinion with fact. Now, if feminism had shifted its core ideal away from equality then we could have a discussion, but that has not happened and it was not what you asserted.
informational · photo_4
Seven, the Archivist 12h It's not I who've redefined words and tampered with the language. That would be the scumfucks who invented the ideology you accepted.
informational · photo_4
Mike Underell @ 5h If someone invents something then they're creating a definition. Not redefining it. They didn't tamper with the language. They created the language. You don't like feminism. Just say that. You don't need to create some song and dance. Just say you don't like feminism, or women, or you don't care to see women get equal rights. Whichever one(s) fit your line of thinking. But instead of saying that, you're running around wanting me to validate your idea by debating you. I can't debate you over something that is factually wrong. There is no debating facts. You're wrong and it's okay to admit that.