Viral Hooks
Trending short videosExplains study about human intelligence
The edit1 shot · 7 text
Shots Text

Performance

Views
5.2M
Likes
433.1K
Comments
6.6K
Engagement
8.4%
Outlier
38.3×

Video #17263 · Yap

Explains study about human intelligencefrom @womp_tomp

[01]

Overview

The speaker recounts a psychological study where 30% of participants failed to understand the conservation of volume when orange juice was poured into a smaller glass. He uses this study as an analogy to argue that a significant portion of the population lacks basic conceptual understanding, comparing it to a child's grasp of object permanence. He concludes by advising viewers to remember this cognitive limitation when engaging in arguments, as some people may be incapable of understanding complex logical concepts.

[02]

Simple outline

  1. 1State a surprising study.
  2. 2Explain the cognitive flaw.
  3. 3Apply to a relatable scenario.
  4. 4Deliver a dismissive punchline.

[03]

Related videos

[04]

Classification

Format
Concepts
Case Study ReminderAnecdotal Philosophy
Elements
Text OverlayJump Cut

[05]

Hook analysis

What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds

Title hook

THEY DID A

Verbal hook

Did a study where they've had, orange juice poured from one glass into, like, a smaller glass...

Visual hook

Direct-to-camera close-up shot of the speaker in a car, creating an intimate and personal feel that immediately focuses attention on his message.

[07]

Hook and payoff

The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back

Hook

Introduce a simple, intriguing real-world experiment or study to create immediate curiosity about its purpose and outcome.

Payoff

The Dismissive Conclusion. Deliver a blunt, definitive, and often coarse final statement that dismisses the 'failing' group as unreachable, providing the viewer with a sense of validation and a memorable, shareable punchline.

[08]

Narrative framework

The structural pattern this video runs on

Framework

The Cognitive Gap Framework

To illustrate a common frustration by presenting a simple, surprising cognitive test that a large portion of the population allegedly fails, thereby reframing the frustration as an unbridgeable intellectual gap.

  1. 1

    The Shocking Result

    Reveal the counter-intuitive or illogical outcome of the experiment, highlighting a surprising statistic to establish the scale of the cognitive failure.

  2. 2

    The Intellectual Diagnosis

    Provide a simplified psychological or logical explanation for why the failure occurred, defining the specific cognitive concept that the 'failing' group cannot grasp.

  3. 3

    The Relatable Application

    Bridge the abstract concept to a common, frustrating real-world experience (e.g., arguing, debating), warning the viewer that they are likely encountering this exact cognitive deficit in others.

  4. 4

    The Escalating Analogy

    Use a powerful, often demeaning or hyperbolic analogy (e.g., comparing adults to babies) to dramatize the intellectual gap and solidify the creator's point.

Themes

  • Human intelligence
  • Cognitive biases
  • The futility of certain arguments
  • Social commentary

Techniques

  • Analogical reasoning
  • Storytelling
  • Direct address

Post caption

#womptomp #politics

Text overlays

  • contextual · beginning

    THEY DID A

  • contextual · beginning

    ORANGE JUICE POURED FROM ONE GLASS INTO, LIKE, A SMALLER GLASS

  • contextual · beginning

    30% OF THE POPULATION WAS LIKE, YEAH,

  • contextual · middle

    CAN'T CONCEPTUALIZE, LIKE, THE PERMANENCE OF, VOLUME OR SOMETHING,

  • contextual · middle

    ABOVE OBJECT PERMANENCE.

  • contextual · middle

    YOU'RE BASICALLY FIGHTING WITH PEOPLE WHO GO, OH MY GOSH, WHEN YOU PLAY PEEKABOO WITH THEM

  • contextual · end

    THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THE F*CK YOU'RE SAYING.

Transcript

Did a study where they've had, orange juice poured from one glass into, like, a smaller glass, and it and it made it look like there was more orange juice. And then they asked tier participants, like, is that more orange juice? And, like, 30% of them in The United States, it was, like, 30% of the population was, like, yeah. That's more orange juice. Even though they watch the same amount be poured from one glass to the next glass. Meaning, they can't conceptualize, like, the permanence of, like, volume or something, which is just keep that in mind when you're arguing with anybody. Like, they might be one of those people. But if you don't no, like, that's, like, basic that's one step above object permanence. You're basically fighting with people who go, oh my gosh, when you play peekaboo with them, and you're trying to get them to understand, like, the difference between, like, a theoretical statement and an actual one, like, logical syllogisms. I was actually talking descriptively. They don't know what the fuck you're saying.

Explains study about human intelligence | Viral Hooks