@womp_tomp
Instagram · Yap
@womp_tomp #politics
@womp_tomp
Instagram · Yap
@womp_tomp #politics
Performance
Video #38389 · Yap
[01]
The creator delivers a passionate monologue critiquing the perceived hypocrisy of modern progressive politics. He begins by sarcastically comparing historical punishments like burning at the stake to contemporary online outrage, using the specific example of a high schooler being doxxed and harassed. He then expands this into a broader philosophical argument that progressives, despite their claims of rationality, behave like religious zealots when their core beliefs are challenged, proving that all humans are fundamentally tribal, religious, and reliant on narratives.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook · 35%
I CAN'T BELIEVE BURN PEOPLE AT
Verbal hook · 45%
I can't believe they used to burn people at this stage.
Visual hook · 20%
A historical black-and-white illustration of a person being burned at the stake is displayed prominently at the top of the screen, immediately establishing a dramatic and historical theme.
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
Juxtapose a widely condemned historical practice with a similar, modern behavior attributed to a target group, creating an immediate moral framing and sense of cognitive dissonance.
Payoff
Deliver a concise, memorable, and cutting final verdict that dismisses the target group's entire worldview as a form of ignorance or lack of self-awareness, providing a powerful concluding punch.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Hypocrisy Gauntlet
To deconstruct an opposing ideology by framing its modern behavior as a hypocritical repeat of historical intolerance, then systematically dismantling its core tenets through caricature and contradiction, and finally replacing it with a proposed 'fundamental truth' about human nature.
The Modern Case Study
Provide a specific, contemporary example that embodies the modern version of the historical transgression, making the abstract hook concrete and relatable.
The Central Accusation
Explicitly state the core hypocrisy: the target group acts in the very way they condemn in others or in the past, establishing the video's central thesis.
The Ideological Caricature
Set up a strawman by articulating the target group's stated beliefs or principles in a slightly exaggerated or simplified way, preparing it to be knocked down.
The Ideological Collapse
Demonstrate how the target group immediately violates their own stated principles when faced with a challenging counter-idea, revealing their reaction to be emotional and tribal, not rational.
The Secondary Caricature & Takedown
Introduce a second core belief of the target group and expose its internal contradiction using a vivid, relatable example, further cementing the hypocrisy claim.
The Grand Unifying Theory
Present the creator's own overarching thesis about a fundamental aspect of human nature, which the target group's ideology supposedly ignores or misunderstands.
#politics
title · beginning
I CAN'T BELIEVE BURN PEOPLE AT
contextual · beginning
WHAT WAS THAT?
contextual · beginning
A HIGH SCHOOLER MUD SHARKING SINGLE MOMS CALL HIM D.F.
contextual · beginning
A MINOR. ILLEGALLY DOCKS ALL OF HIS INFO
contextual · beginning
PASSING AROUND HIS UNDERAGE 16 YEAR OLD SEMI NUDE SHIRTLESS PHOTOS.
informational · beginning
POSTMAN HAS SINGLE HANDEDLY DISPROVING PROGRESSIVE POLITICS.
informational · middle
BEHAVE LIKE PURITANICAL WITCH HUNTERS WHEN A MINOR POKES FUN AT THEIR SACRED COWS.
informational · middle
PEOPLE ARE NOT FUNDAMENTALLY TRIBAL.
informational · middle
WE DON'T NEED NARRATIVES, WE DON'T NEED MYTHOLOGY, WE JUST NEED REASON AND STATISTICS AND DATA SCIENCE.
informational · end
PEOPLE ARE FUNDAMENTALLY RELIGIOUS.
informational · end
THE HUMAN CONDITION IS RELIGIOUS.
informational · end
THEY'RE UNBURDENED FROM FUCKING AWARENESS.
I can't believe they used to burn people at this stage. What was that? A high schooler said something about mud sharking single moms? Call him a PDF, even though he's a minor. Illegally docs all of his info and then start passing around his underage 16 year old semi nude shirtless photos. Postman has single handedly disproven progressive politics. The same people who propose that fundamentally conflicting worse views need to just get along because we need to move past irrational mythology rank narratives and worship behave like puritanical witch hunters when a miner pokes fun at their sacred cows. People are not fundamentally tribal. Thousand year long blood feuds and racial differences don't matter at all. You're just an ooga booga bigot. What was that? Something that the bad guy say? We don't need narratives. We don't need mythology. We just need reason and statistics and data, science. Did you just say something about racial IQ? Did you just propose a hypothetical that challenges my worldview? Oh, yeah? Well, narratives. People only fight about immaterial, empirically unverified principles that they worship because their basic needs are not met by the state, said a fat guy with twenty five Netflix subscriptions and a roof over his head before he proceeded to then argue about equality. An immaterial empirically unverified principle floating in the air that he will defend with his honor. Maybe even go to battle for that would be if he could get off the fucking couch. People are fundamentally religious. Morality matters. You cannot have a perfectly neutral secular state. There is no such thing. We need narratives to make sense of our lives and our identity. People are absolutely tribal, and a political philosophy which does not account for this is just wrong. The human condition is religious. Progressives are not unburdened from their condition, they're unburdened from fucking awareness.