Political take and direct rebuttal.from @womp_tomp

Transcript

Nothing against immigration, they just need to come here legally. Oh, so you're perfect and you've never committed a crime? Sure, you've never walked across the street when you weren't supposed to, you've never jaywalked, you've never went more than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit because that's a felony in a lot of states who could go to prison for that and actually be tried for reckless endangerment. You've never done that? You've never smoked weed in states where it's illegal? You've never flown with THC or edibles in your in your purse? All of that's illegal, all that's against the law and all of that could get you jail time if the law were applied equally to every single person that's what irritates the fuck out of me is that this argument comes from a place of moral superiority like I'm a morally upstanding citizen, I would never do anything wrong. Everything is arbitrary. The law is made up. What makes a person illegal? Some government that decided arbitrarily that this is the boundaries for where the land begins and ends? Certified repeal the nineteenth classic moment from this woman. What are you fucking talking about? Like, I know she thinks it's a good argument because her, like, reinforcement mechanism is, like, liberal Zoom call snappies, but this is, like, genuinely terrible argumentation. You can't tell someone else not to break the law if you've broken the law. First of all, you can. It doesn't make it not true that you ought not break the law. And second of all, what law? Obviously, the degree of legal infraction