@womp_tomp
Instagram · Split screen
@womp_tomp we actually do know #politics #womptomp
@womp_tomp
Instagram · Split screen
@womp_tomp we actually do know #politics #womptomp
Performance
Video #41679 · Split screen
[01]
The creator presents a split-screen video where he reacts to and refutes a clip of Anne Hathaway on "The View" stating that "abortion can be another word for mercy." He begins with a satirical comment before launching into a detailed philosophical and theological argument against her position, discussing concepts like the purpose of the human soul (teleology), the value of life from conception, the meaning of suffering, and the foundations of objective morality versus moral subjectivism. He uses a series of text overlays to summarize his key points as he builds his case against the pro-choice argument presented in the clip.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook · 30%
WE TALK ABOUT THIS ENOUGH.
Verbal hook · 60%
I don't think we talk about this enough. Abortion can be another word for mercy.
Visual hook · 10%
A split-screen format showing a clip from the TV show 'The View' on top and a man reacting directly to the camera on the bottom, immediately establishing a commentary or reaction dynamic.
[06]
Steal this for your own video
I don't think we talk about this enough. .
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
The Provocation Clip: The video opens with a short, unaltered clip of a person making a controversial statement. This immediately establishes a point of contention and engages viewers who either agree or disagree.
Payoff
The Conclusive Dichotomy: The video concludes by framing the entire issue as a clear and mutually exclusive choice between two opposing worldviews and their logical outcomes, forcing the viewer to choose a side and providing a definitive end to the argument.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Philosophical Takedown
To deconstruct an opponent's argument by exposing its flawed foundational premise, and then constructing a superior counter-argument from a new, 'correct' foundation, culminating in a binary choice for the viewer.
The Hyperbolic Rejection
The creator immediately and aggressively dismisses the initial statement using a shocking analogy or hyperbolic statement. This establishes a strong opposing stance and signals the video's argumentative nature.
The Foundational Diagnosis
The creator identifies and names the core philosophical or logical error that they believe underpins the opponent's entire argument, moving the debate from the specific claim to its root cause.
The Counter-Thesis Introduction
A new, fundamental principle or worldview is introduced as the correct foundation for understanding the issue. This pivots from deconstruction to construction.
The Logical Elaboration
The creator systematically builds their case from the new premise, using specific terminology, logic, and supporting analogies to demonstrate its validity and application to the topic.
The Pre-emptive Defense
The creator anticipates common objections to their argument and refutes them using further analogies, strengthening their position by addressing potential weaknesses.
The Worldview Inversion
The creator explains the opponent's logic by showing how it follows from their underlying (and allegedly flawed) worldview. This frames the opponent's conclusion as a symptom of a deeper philosophical error.
we actually do know #politics #womptomp
informational · beginning
WE TALK ABOUT THIS ENOUGH.
informational · beginning
ABORTION CAN BE ANOTHER WORD FOR MERCY.
informational · beginning
COMPUTER, ORDER A REAPER DRONE STRIKE ON THE VIEW IMMEDIATELY.
informational · beginning
IF ABORTION IS MERCY, THEN RAPE IS A COMPLIMENT.
informational · beginning
THE CONCLUSION OF EMPATHY WITH NO REASON.
informational · middle
HUMAN BEINGS HAVE A SOUL WITH A PURPOSE.
informational · middle
THAT SOUL IS PRESENT IN A ZYGOTE.
informational · middle
IT IS A PERSON IN ITS FIRST INSTANCE.
informational · middle
IT'S TELEOLOGY, WHAT IT'S ORIENTED TOWARDS, RIGHT? NOT ITS PRESENT LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS.
informational · end
IF YOU DON'T THINK HUMAN LIVES HAVE LIKE, PURPOSE, THEN REALLY THERE'S NO REASON FOR SUFFERING.
informational · end
IF A FETUS IS JUST A CLUMP OF CELLS WITH NO HIGHER VALUE OR PURPOSE, THEN SO ARE YOU.
informational · end
THE RIGHT TO ABORTION IS AS MADE UP AS SPIDER MAN.
informational · end
IF MORALITY IS ROOTED IN THE INTRINSIC PURPOSE OF THE HUMAN SOUL, THEN THERE IS NO RIGHT TO ABORTION.
I don't think we talk about this enough. Abortion can be another word for mercy. We don't know. Computer, order a Reaper drone strike on Tier View immediately. If abortion is mercy, then rape is a compliment. The idea that it's better to snuff the the child out of existence than to let them suffer is the conclusion of empathy with no reason. The reason suffering matters is because human beings have a soul with a purpose. And what's good for them is what helps them towards that purpose, which is their fulfillment, their flourishing, eudaimonia, whatever you wanna call it. And that soul is present in a zygote. All of its characteristic operations are oriented towards the development of a rational nature, towards having a will and intellect. It is a person in its first instance, and it's valuable for the same reason that you're valuable. It's teleology, what it's oriented towards, right, not its present level of consciousness. People in comas are still people. There's no subjective experience. Babies are still people, even though they have the conscious level of, like, a demented cat. Is a baby equally valuable as a demented cat, or is there something more fundamental to the baby? We know this. Everybody knows this. Better, of course, if you don't think human lives have, like, purpose, then really there's no reason for suffering. So it'd be better to not suffer than to exist and suffer. But if that's the case, then it doesn't really matter if you're forced to carry the pregnancy to tier. Because if a fetus is just a clump of cells with no higher value or purpose, then so are you. You're just one that has certain emotional preferences in an otherwise indifferent cosmos. That's the funny thing about modern metaphysics and, like, moral subjectivism. Morality is not rooted objectively in the fulfillment of human ends, which are knowable by reason, but instead exists in the human mind, whatever you mean by that, then, like, then the right to abortion is as made up as Spider Rank. But if morality is rooted in the kind of intrinsic purpose of the human soul, then there is no right to abortion.