Post caption
How did pressure from President Trump lead to this week’s extraordinary indictment of the former FBI director James Comey? Maggie Haberman, White House correspondent at The New York Times, explains.
Tap the link in our bio to read more. Video by Maggie Haberman, Alexandra Ostasiewicz and Stephanie Swart/The New York Times
Transcript
James Comey, the former FBI director who President Trump fired in 2017, was indicted on two counts, one of making a false statement and one count of obstruction of a congressional proceeding. It wasn't surprising that Comey was indicted because president Trump wanted him to be. What was surprising was that it came after several prosecutors memorialized in writing their concerns about proceeding with an indictment against Comey because they thought it would be too weak to take to trial. Nonetheless, President Trump fired the US attorney in the Eastern District Of Virginia and replaced him with a personal lawyer of his who has no prosecutorial experience to get the indictment done. The history between Trump and Comey is both long and particularly fraught. Comey was the director of the FBI when president Trump himself was under investigation in 2017 for possible ties between his 2016 campaign and Russians looking to impact the outcome of that race. According to memos that Comey wrote, president Trump demanded loyalty, in Trump's word, from Comey. Trump wanted that loyalty to be displayed publicly and Comey refused. President Trump came into office a second time with a long list of targets he wanted to see face some kind of payback for his own investigations and the indictments that he faced in the years that he was out of office. James Comey was at the top of that list. Comey responded to this indictment saying We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn't either. Presidents have generally tried to respect the norm of Justice Department independence, meaning not directing specific prosecutions that could be perceived as political. President Trump is now surrounded by advisors who believe in a maximalist approach to executive power. They believe there is no agency in the executive branch that is not within the president's control, including the justice department. Even if this case does not result in a conviction of James Comey, the mere fact of its existence, given how many prosecutors suggested this was too weak to take to court, could have a chilling effect on public dissent from critics of president Trump going forward.