@womp_tomp
Instagram · Graphic Yap
@womp_tomp a CST classic #politics
@womp_tomp
Instagram · Graphic Yap
@womp_tomp a CST classic #politics
Performance
Video #34063 · Graphic Yap
[01]
The creator delivers a monologue explaining his political and economic philosophy, starting with a controversial take on billionaires. He introduces and advocates for distributism, using various visual aids like charts and memes to define it and contrast it with what he calls crony capitalism. He then argues that socialism is a far worse alternative, equating it to bureaucratic tyranny, and concludes by asserting that the current economic problems are caused by state regulation, not free-market capitalism.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook · 55%
I DON'T NECESSARILY LIKE BILLIONAIRES,
Verbal hook · 40%
Don't necessarily like billionaires, but I hate the people that dislike them so much.
Visual hook · 5%
A medium close-up of the speaker talking directly to the camera, with a prominent image of Elon Musk overlaid on the screen.
[06]
Steal this for your own video
I DON'T NECESSARILY , BUT I
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
A provocative 'I don't like X, but I hate the anti-X crowd more' statement that subverts a common opinion and establishes an in-group.
Payoff
A final, dismissive condemnation of the opposing viewpoint, framing its proponents as naive actors who are inadvertently making the problem worse. This solidifies the viewer's sense of intellectual superiority.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The 'Third Way' Polemic
To dismantle a popular but flawed solution to a problem by first establishing a contrarian stance, then introducing an ideal but less-known alternative, and finally arguing that the status quo, despite its flaws, is superior to the popular solution.
The Target Identification
Visually present a clear, concise example (like a tweet or quote) that represents the simplistic opposing viewpoint to be deconstructed.
The Ideal Solution Reveal
Introduce and define a more nuanced, often less-known, 'third way' ideology or solution that the speaker champions as the true ideal, supported by visual aids.
The Status Quo Diagnosis
Analyze the current flawed system, explaining how it falls short of the ideal and creates the problem the opposition is trying to solve.
The Alternative's Annihilation
Aggressively argue why the popular opposing solution is not just wrong, but catastrophically worse than the current flawed system, often using hyperbole and emotional language.
The Lesser Evil Proclamation
Make a definitive statement choosing the flawed status quo over the proposed alternative, framing it as a pragmatic, if reluctant, choice.
The Intellectual Proof
Rapidly present a series of data points, charts, or complex theories to provide objective, intellectual support for the argument.
a CST classic #politics
informational · beginning
Capitalism is better than socialism because one man gets to be a trillionaire instead of everyone having healthcare
contextual · beginning
(dead before red unironically)
informational · beginning
DISTRIBUTISM "is the wild idea that property, power, and wealth should not be concentrated in the hands of a few..."
title · middle
Hierarchy of Preference for Economic Systems
contextual · middle
we are here
informational · middle
bureaucrat /b(y)·ro·okræt/ [slur]
informational · end
"Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists." - G. K. Chesterton
informational · end
"The Christian solution is to get behind neither Capital nor Labor exclusively..." - Ven. Fulton J. Sheen
title · end
20 Years of Price Changes in The United States
title · end
Who Gets the Money First? The Cantillon Effect
Don't necessarily like billionaires, but I hate the people that dislike them so much. I enjoy watching them make more money. Real? Ong, is that real? Because I'm a distributist. I think the widespread ownership of private property, the means to create your own wealth, owning land, familial inheritance, letting everybody get a bit of a chunk of the pie, doesn't have to be equal, people are not equal, is the right thing to do generally, morally, with the economy. And that is prohibited when you have a tiny group of people, especially when they have their hands in the state using regulations along with economic capitalistic forces to prevent access to that possibility for the average person. The only thing worse than that would be to hand it over to the people who think allowing the state via a bunch of admins, a bunch of bureaucrats, to have control over private property and to get to decide if you bad own land and buy houses and start businesses. Yeah. I don't think so. Let's swap out tiny minority of people who hate you with an even smaller minority of people who hate you, plus they're legally allowed to kill you. I would rather create a million Elon Musks than have communism, which is, of course, impossible. So I mean, like, you know, heavy level socialism, because collective ownership is meaningless. You can't solve the economic calculation problem and you're gay. And your answer to a bad situation is, like, let's make it worse. Because crony capitalism is arguably more early stage socialism than it is just capitalism. And when you look at all of the costs of items that are going up, it's all the things most heavily regulated by the state. Even our money is regulated by the state. Look up the Cantillon effect. I don't like the way we're headed. Let's pedal that direction faster.