@womp_tomp
Instagram · Graphic Yap
@womp_tomp Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you #politics
@womp_tomp
Instagram · Graphic Yap
@womp_tomp Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you #politics
Performance
Video #38618 · Graphic Yap
[01]
The creator delivers a monologue arguing that communism is fundamentally about robbing people of private property at gunpoint, requiring a coercive state. He critiques what he sees as the evasive 'theoretical babble' of communists by showing a series of memes and images to illustrate his points, such as the definition of abolishing private property and the logical necessity of a state to enforce it. He concludes with an analogy comparing the communist goal of a stateless society to wanting to reach the moon without a spaceship, expressing his disdain for the ideology.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook · 45%
WHY CAN'T COMMUNISTS
Verbal hook · 50%
Why can't communists just shack up and admit they wanna rob people at gunpoint?
Visual hook · 5%
An image of a person in a red beret and a shirt with a red star is overlaid on the creator's talking head shot.
[06]
Steal this for your own video
Why won't just admit they want ?
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
A direct, provocative question that frames a target group's ideology as a simple, malicious act, immediately establishing a confrontational tone.
Payoff
A final, visceral statement of personal contempt for the opposing group, providing a cathartic and validating conclusion for the intended audience.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Absurdist Analogy Takedown
To deconstruct an opposing ideology by simplifying its core tenets to their most negative literal interpretation, anticipating a common rebuttal, and then refuting that rebuttal with a dismissive, absurd analogy to expose its perceived logical flaws.
The Brutal Definition
The creator takes a core tenet of the target ideology and defines it in the most extreme, literal, and violent terms possible, stripping it of any nuance.
The Inevitable Enforcer
This beat logically connects the 'Brutal Definition' to the necessity of a coercive authority (e.g., 'the state') to implement it, framing the ideology as inherently authoritarian.
The Pre-emptive Rebuttal
The creator voices the most common counter-argument from the opposing side, but frames it as a predictable, evasive talking point, setting it up to be dismantled.
The Absurdist Analogy
A simple, unrelated, and ridiculous analogy is constructed to mirror the perceived flawed logic of the opponent's counter-argument, making their position seem nonsensical and hypocritical.
Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you #politics
informational · beginning
BRO, HAVE YOU READ ME WITH THE RIGHT CONSCIOUSNESS?
informational · middle
give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you
informational · middle
Everyone will not just If your solution to some problem relies on "If everyone would just..." then you do not have a solution. Everyone is not going to just. At not time in the history of the universe has everyone just, and they're not going to start now.
informational · middle
COMMUNISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED OR... MY SPECIFIC, PERFECT, ENTIRELY INFALLIABLE BRAND OF COMMUNISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED
Why can't communists just shack up and admit they wanna rob people at gunpoint? Why is it always best, like, retreat to wormy, sophistic, theoretical babble? What do you think abolishing private property means? It means you own a land or you own a building. Communists don't want you to, so they're gonna take it. And then if you resist, they're gonna shoot you. That's what that means. And, of course, that involves the state. How else would you deprive millions of people of what is at best, at bare minimum, widely considered a natural right, if not with some centralized coercive authority. And despite most of the mainstream Marxist theories proposing that the state is like this totalitarian transitional vehicle to, quote, unquote, actual communism. When you press them about that, these fucking losers will just go, actually, communism is when no state. It's like, so you're part of the I wanna get to the moon movement. Right? Yeah. So you wanna use a spaceship to get to the moon? No. Moonism is when on the moon. How do we get tier? With a spaceship. Like, I loathe these people with every fiber of my being.