The creator, a brand and cultural strategist, presents a three-point analysis arguing that we are entering a 'post-brainrot' era. First, he explains that in-real-life (IRL) experiences are becoming the new status symbol, pushing back against tech addiction. Second, he discusses how the rise of low-quality 'AI slop' will cause algorithmic failure and lead audiences to reject derivative content. Finally, he addresses short-form content burnout, predicting that brands will evolve into media companies producing more substantial long-form and offline content to build deeper connections.
Post caption
Have we passed peak brain rot?
Today: 3 signs I’m observing that we are heading into a post-brain rot era, due to a confluence of shifting societal attitudes about our relationship with tech, the further advance of AI into content, and short-form burnout driving a need for more diverse and interesting forms of content.
#marketing #brandstrategy #marketingstrategy #brandmarketing
Transcript
Are we heading into a post brain rot era? Here's three signs I'm picking up as a brand and cultural strategy consultant. Number one, IRL is the new status symbol. 2024 saw the luxury industry get deeper into run clubs, book clubs, pop ups, and activations. I'm I'm predicting this is gonna drive an attitude that spending more time IRL is seen as a status symbol, which conversely means that being tech addicted will be seen as a low status trait. I think this is also gonna apply in the professional world where I'm predicting a big swing back to in person meetings. This has more to do with AI because once we collectively understand that it's capable of drafting emails, writing content, and automating half the job that most people do, we're gonna want to see the human in front of us no we can sense check ourselves whether they have any capabilities at all. Number two, AI slop and algo failure. I've spoken before about how algorithms failed us by flattening our culture into a world where everything looks, feels, and sounds the same. But those algorithms are not equipped to handle the deluge of AI slop that's heading our way. I've already seen a bunch of AI generated content that's on its way to ruining YouTube because the algorithm is just not good at policing or discerning what's made with AI. Recall that AI is a composite of perspectives. It can't create anything new. The content people produce with it is a sort of super brain tier, a copy of a copy of a copy, which I think audiences are gonna start to find pretty repulsive when it's most of the content they're being served. Number three, short form burnout and brand as media. Part of the term brain rot is acknowledging that a lot of short form content is just unsatisfying to consume. Yes, YouTube, TikTok, and Reels have replaced traditional media as entertainment channels, but ironically, what I'm seeing is users being receptive to more long form content on these platforms now. Good, egg is real, and I think the audience is ready for more substance, even on here. I think great brands are gonna respond to this by starting to behave more like media companies, where they're gonna have their own in house curators, editors, writers, photographers, videographers. That's already opening the door for more diverse social content like mini series, game shows, documentaries. But it also means going further offline into things we thought that worse dead like catalogs, zines, and even books that really helped to build out a more cohesive and evocative brand universe. I'm optimistic for 2025, but what do you all reckon? Can we get even more brain rotted from here?