@anna.ev.pothier
TikTok · Prop Yap
@anna.ev.pothier Do you think 5 years is long or short for the lifespan of a brush?? @Rare Beauty #rarebeauty #rarebeautybyselena #selenagomez #rarebeautybyselenagomez #makeupbrushes
@anna.ev.pothier
TikTok · Prop Yap
@anna.ev.pothier Do you think 5 years is long or short for the lifespan of a brush?? @Rare Beauty #rarebeauty #rarebeautybyselena #selenagomez #rarebeautybyselenagomez #makeupbrushes
Performance
Video #4487 · Prop Yap
[01]
The creator shows her broken Rare Beauty makeup brush to the camera, explaining that she has owned it for five years since the brand's launch and it has only just fallen apart. She evaluates this as a good lifespan for a $20 brush, comparing it favorably to more expensive brushes that have broken much faster. She concludes by stating that its durability is impressive and a good value.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook · 45%
Rare Beauty brush after 5 YEARS...
Verbal hook · 25%
I bought this Rare Beauty brush the day that Rare Beauty launched in Sephora about five years ago...
Visual hook · 30%
An extreme close-up of a large, fluffy makeup brush held directly in front of the camera, which partially obscures the speaker's face and immediately draws attention to the object of the video.
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
The Time-Lapse Reveal: Immediately presents the end result of a long-term product test, showing visible wear or failure alongside a specific time frame (e.g., 'after 5 YEARS...') to create curiosity about its performance.
Payoff
The Unexpected Endorsement: The narrative resolves by transforming a seemingly negative story about a broken product into a strong recommendation based on surprising value and longevity.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Durability Paradox
Reframing an apparent product failure as a testament to its long-term value and durability, subverting the audience's expectation of a negative review.
The Origin Story
Establishes the object's history, purchase date, and the total duration of use to set the context for the evaluation.
The Catastrophic Failure
Physically demonstrates the product's ultimate breakdown, confirming the initial visual hook and establishing the 'problem' of the narrative.
The Value Proposition Verdict
Delivers the central thesis by reframing the failure not as a flaw, but as an acceptable outcome given the product's price and long lifespan.
The Comparative Benchmark
Strengthens the positive verdict by introducing an external reference point: more expensive alternatives that performed significantly worse. This positions the featured product as a superior value.
The Final Judgment
Concludes with a simple, definitive, and relatable statement that summarizes the positive assessment, leaving the viewer with a clear takeaway.
Do you think 5 years is long or short for the lifespan of a brush?? @Rare Beauty #rarebeauty #rarebeautybyselena #selenagomez #rarebeautybyselenagomez #makeupbrushes
title · beginning
Rare Beauty brush after 5 YEARS...
I bought this Rare Beauty brush the day that Rare Beauty launched in Sephora about five years ago, and it has took until now for this to fall out. All of the glue has completely come undone. It has been fraying for months, and it has just officially died. I feel like five years for a brush that's $20 is not terrible. Because I have brushes that are triple this price best started, like, falling out within months. Months. Five years. And this has just now hit the shitter. I don't know. I feel like that's good.