@growwithevelyn
Instagram 路 Greenscreen Talking Head
@growwithevelyn Which creator has the better marketing strategy? Shelby or Jeremy? Let me know what you think 馃檶
@growwithevelyn
Instagram 路 Greenscreen Talking Head
@growwithevelyn Which creator has the better marketing strategy? Shelby or Jeremy? Let me know what you think 馃檶
Performance
Video #49023 路 Greenscreen Talking Head
[01]
The creator compares the marketing strategies of Shelby Sapp and Jeremy Miner by analyzing their respective ad libraries. She breaks down the quantity and type of ads each runs, contrasts their target audiences (unaware vs. problem-aware), and explains their different monetization funnels (direct high-ticket vs. low-ticket audience growth), concluding by asking the audience to vote on which strategy is better.
[02]
[03]
[04]
[05]
What stops the scroll in the first 3 seconds
Title hook
Whose Marketing Is Better? Shelby Sapp Vs Jeremy Miner
Verbal hook
Whose marketing is better? Shelby Sapp or Jeremy Miner?
Visual hook
A split-screen graphic with a narrator overlaid in the center, immediately establishing a visual comparison between two individuals on color-blocked backgrounds.
[07]
The promise the opener makes, and how the video pays it back
Hook
A direct 'A vs. B' question that frames the content as a debate and establishes the two subjects of comparison.
Payoff
A concluding statement that validates both approaches as expert-level, then deflects the final judgment to the audience with a direct call-to-action to comment with their opinion.
[08]
The structural pattern this video runs on
Framework
The Comparative Case Study
A side-by-side analysis of two subjects' strategies, culminating in an audience-driven verdict rather than a definitive answer from the creator.
Contender A: The Quantitative Analysis
Introduce the first subject by presenting a key, quantifiable metric (e.g., number of ads) and a summary of their tactical approach.
Contender B: The Qualitative Contrast
Introduce the second subject as a direct contrast to the first, highlighting a different primary metric or approach (e.g., diversity vs. volume).
The Core Philosophical Divide
Transition from 'what' they do to 'why' they do it. Reveal the fundamental difference in their underlying strategy, philosophy, or target audience.
The Monetization Model Breakdown
Deconstruct the business or conversion model for each subject, explaining how their strategy translates into the desired outcome (e.g., sales, growth).
Which creator has the better marketing strategy? Shelby or Jeremy? Let me know what you think 馃檶
title 路 beginning
Whose Marketing Is Better? Shelby Sapp Vs Jeremy Miner
branding 路 throughout
she sells
branding 路 throughout
7th Level
informational 路 beginning
~390 results
informational 路 beginning
~110 results
call-to-action 路 end
let me know in the comments below
Whose marketing is better? Shelby Sapp or Jeremy Miner? Shelby is running 390 ads, mostly mini video sales letters rank testimonial ads with a few image ads. Meanwhile, Jeremy only has 110 active bad, but with a lot more diversity. He's running one hour long videos, educational content, AI ads, classic VSLs, and a variety of image ads to target different segments of his market. But here's the key difference. Shelby is targeting a much more specific unaware audience. Leveraging her lifestyle to sell sales has a new opportunity. Jeremy, on the other hand, is targeting a broader problem aware audience. Educational, using actual sales training and valuable content to demonstrate his expertise. Shelby's ads are built to directly monetize a a cold audience. All of her traffic is running to a free webinar where the goal is to turn those clicks into high ticket clients. Jeremy does the opposite. He uses a low ticket and a subscription offer to fund his audience growth then monetize on the back end. Both of better class in marketing. Best who do you think is winning? Shelby's direct monetization strategy or Jeremy's long term audience play? Let me know in the comments