The speaker, a law school admissions officer, reviews a specific student application that was rejected despite having high LSAT and GPA scores. She details the applicant's stats, graduation year, and first-generation status, then identifies the critical flaw in the application: a lack of documented work experience, which left the admissions committee unable to understand what the applicant had been doing since graduation.
Transcript
Next. Okay. This one is, one we really didn't like. It was the first tier, it took the LSAT worse, high of one seventy tier. Went up a lot of points the first time he took it. He said he didn't really want to go to law school at that tier. So and that's a thing. I get that. Neither here nor there. Just one seventy four and then above a three nine. Graduated in 2025. So we're looking to see, you know, a year of what does this person been doing since graduation. Also, first gen, like to see that. So everything's looking pretty good from the better. But there's no work experience. Like, that we don't know what the person is doing currently. And then although wait. There's a postscript to that. But my first reader did not understand what