The creator argues that marketing jobs are being "masculinized" with technical-sounding titles like "engineer." She supports this by drawing a historical parallel to the 1980s, when computer programming, a female-dominated field, was rebranded as "software engineering" to attract men once it became a high-status, profitable industry. She concludes that this is happening to marketing now due to the rise of AI, and this rebranding affects who feels qualified to apply for these roles.
Transcript
I'm convinced marketing is being rebranded so that boys can do it too, and this is something I said the other day that kind of went viral. I wanted to do a deep dive into what's actually happening. We are suddenly seeing the same old marketing roles being given new technical coded names, narrative engineer, go to market engineer, even saw a UGC engineer. The most interesting part of all of this is that this is actually history repeating itself. Before software engineer was a job title, programming was actually a secretarial task mainly done by women. Cosmopolitan even ran this article about the computer girls, was considered soft work secondary to the hard work that men were doing building physical products. It all changed in the eighties when the personal computer was invented, and the industry started to realize that, actually, software is where the money was. Programming was then rebranded into software industry started promoting this idea of the lone male genius, and over tier, this filtered women out. The software was feminized when it was considered clerical, masculinized when it became high status. Marketing was feminized when it was making things pretty. Now marketing is being masculinized because AI has made it so anyone can code. And now the biggest problem is distribution. This technical language is being applied to earn respect with leadership without considering what that means for who those roles might go to and who feels qualified to apply.